[Dock-fans] use_clash_overlap and use_internal_energy
Jerry Parks
jmp17 at duke.edu
Wed Jun 11 18:48:39 PDT 2008
John
All the results I mentioned in my previous email were obtained with DOCK
v6.2.
You have a good point about just buying the compounds, but apparently our
experimental collaborators want to make at least some of them on their
own. I guess it's good synthesis practice for the grad students.
So, do you see any obvious input file errors that could be fixed so that
we get more realistic geometries? Would we need to use AMBER Score to
prevent the intramolecular ligand clashes?
Thanks,
Jerry
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, John J. Irwin wrote:
> Hi Jerry
>
> Are you using the latest version, DOCK 6.2 ?
>
> I hope you will not have to synthesize compounds, but just buy them.
> That is the whole point of ZINC - to shorten the hypothesis-test cycle.
>
> Good luck.
>
> John
>
>
> Jerry Parks wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > We have been using anchor-and-grow to perform flexible docking and
> > minimization on a large number of compounds from the zinc7 database. Many
> > of the highest scoring compounds suffer from geometries with unreasonable,
> > overlapping functional groups and rings. I really don't think we can trust
> > the results we've obtained thus far.
> >
> > Our goal is to generate leads via docking, then synthesize approximately
> > 20-50 molecules and assay them to determine if they are in fact
> > inhibitors.
> >
> > I have seen previous posts regarding "interpenetrated" structures, etc.,
> > but I'm still not sure how to circumvent this problem. It seems to me that
> > use_internal_energy should prevent these types of overlaps if the
> > repulsive vdw exponent is in effect. Any help/advice would be appreciated.
> >
> > I have attached a representative input file below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jerry
> >
> > --------------------
> >
> > ligand_atom_file test-8.mol2
> > limit_max_ligands no
> > skip_molecule no
> > read_mol_solvation no
> > calculate_rmsd no
> > orient_ligand yes
> > automated_matching yes
> > receptor_site_file ../selected_spheres.sph
> > max_orientations 500
> > critical_points no
> > chemical_matching no
> > use_ligand_spheres no
> > flexible_ligand yes
> > min_anchor_size 40
> > pruning_use_clustering yes
> > pruning_max_orients 100
> > pruning_clustering_cutoff 100
> > use_internal_energy yes
> > internal_energy_att_exp 6
> > internal_energy_rep_exp 12
> > internal_energy_dielectric 4.0
> > use_clash_overlap yes
> > clash_overlap 0.50
> > bump_filter no
> > score_molecules yes
> > contact_score_primary no
> > contact_score_secondary no
> > grid_score_primary yes
> > grid_score_secondary no
> > grid_score_rep_rad_scale 1
> > grid_score_vdw_scale 1
> > grid_score_es_scale 1
> > grid_score_grid_prefix ../grid_999_10
> > dock3.5_score_secondary no
> > continuous_score_secondary no
> > gbsa_zou_score_secondary no
> > gbsa_hawkins_score_secondary no
> > amber_score_secondary no
> > minimize_ligand yes
> > minimize_anchor yes
> > minimize_flexible_growth yes
> > use_advanced_simplex_parameters no
> > simplex_max_cycles 1
> > simplex_score_converge 0.1
> > simplex_cycle_converge 1.0
> > simplex_trans_step 1.0
> > simplex_rot_step 0.1
> > simplex_tors_step 10.0
> > simplex_anchor_max_iterations 500
> > simplex_grow_max_iterations 500
> > simplex_final_min no
> > simplex_random_seed 0
> > atom_model all
> > vdw_defn_file ../vdw_AMBER_parm99.defn
> > flex_defn_file ../flex.defn
> > flex_drive_file ../flex_drive.tbl
> > ligand_outfile_prefix test-8
> > write_orientations no
> > num_scored_conformers_written 1
> > rank_ligands yes
> > max_ranked_ligands 500
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dock-fans mailing list
> > Dock-fans at docking.org
> > http://blur.compbio.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/dock-fans
> >
>
More information about the Dock-fans
mailing list