[Dock-fans] use_clash_overlap and use_internal_energy
John J. Irwin
jji at cgl.ucsf.edu
Thu Jun 12 13:35:58 PDT 2008
Hi Jerry
In an email in dock-fans dated Mon Jul 24 12:07:30 2006, Kaushik
suggests setting clash_overlap to a bigger number, maybe 1.0. I see you
had it at 0.5. So, would you try 1.0 and let us know if that solves the
problem? I do agree you should not see major clashes in docking output.
Hope this helps
John
Jerry Parks wrote:
> John
>
> All the results I mentioned in my previous email were obtained with DOCK
> v6.2.
>
> You have a good point about just buying the compounds, but apparently our
> experimental collaborators want to make at least some of them on their
> own. I guess it's good synthesis practice for the grad students.
>
> So, do you see any obvious input file errors that could be fixed so that
> we get more realistic geometries? Would we need to use AMBER Score to
> prevent the intramolecular ligand clashes?
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, John J. Irwin wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Jerry
>>
>> Are you using the latest version, DOCK 6.2 ?
>>
>> I hope you will not have to synthesize compounds, but just buy them.
>> That is the whole point of ZINC - to shorten the hypothesis-test cycle.
>>
>> Good luck.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> Jerry Parks wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> We have been using anchor-and-grow to perform flexible docking and
>>> minimization on a large number of compounds from the zinc7 database. Many
>>> of the highest scoring compounds suffer from geometries with unreasonable,
>>> overlapping functional groups and rings. I really don't think we can trust
>>> the results we've obtained thus far.
>>>
>>> Our goal is to generate leads via docking, then synthesize approximately
>>> 20-50 molecules and assay them to determine if they are in fact
>>> inhibitors.
>>>
>>> I have seen previous posts regarding "interpenetrated" structures, etc.,
>>> but I'm still not sure how to circumvent this problem. It seems to me that
>>> use_internal_energy should prevent these types of overlaps if the
>>> repulsive vdw exponent is in effect. Any help/advice would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> I have attached a representative input file below.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>> --------------------
>>>
>>> ligand_atom_file test-8.mol2
>>> limit_max_ligands no
>>> skip_molecule no
>>> read_mol_solvation no
>>> calculate_rmsd no
>>> orient_ligand yes
>>> automated_matching yes
>>> receptor_site_file ../selected_spheres.sph
>>> max_orientations 500
>>> critical_points no
>>> chemical_matching no
>>> use_ligand_spheres no
>>> flexible_ligand yes
>>> min_anchor_size 40
>>> pruning_use_clustering yes
>>> pruning_max_orients 100
>>> pruning_clustering_cutoff 100
>>> use_internal_energy yes
>>> internal_energy_att_exp 6
>>> internal_energy_rep_exp 12
>>> internal_energy_dielectric 4.0
>>> use_clash_overlap yes
>>> clash_overlap 0.50
>>> bump_filter no
>>> score_molecules yes
>>> contact_score_primary no
>>> contact_score_secondary no
>>> grid_score_primary yes
>>> grid_score_secondary no
>>> grid_score_rep_rad_scale 1
>>> grid_score_vdw_scale 1
>>> grid_score_es_scale 1
>>> grid_score_grid_prefix ../grid_999_10
>>> dock3.5_score_secondary no
>>> continuous_score_secondary no
>>> gbsa_zou_score_secondary no
>>> gbsa_hawkins_score_secondary no
>>> amber_score_secondary no
>>> minimize_ligand yes
>>> minimize_anchor yes
>>> minimize_flexible_growth yes
>>> use_advanced_simplex_parameters no
>>> simplex_max_cycles 1
>>> simplex_score_converge 0.1
>>> simplex_cycle_converge 1.0
>>> simplex_trans_step 1.0
>>> simplex_rot_step 0.1
>>> simplex_tors_step 10.0
>>> simplex_anchor_max_iterations 500
>>> simplex_grow_max_iterations 500
>>> simplex_final_min no
>>> simplex_random_seed 0
>>> atom_model all
>>> vdw_defn_file ../vdw_AMBER_parm99.defn
>>> flex_defn_file ../flex.defn
>>> flex_drive_file ../flex_drive.tbl
>>> ligand_outfile_prefix test-8
>>> write_orientations no
>>> num_scored_conformers_written 1
>>> rank_ligands yes
>>> max_ranked_ligands 500
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dock-fans mailing list
>>> Dock-fans at docking.org
>>> http://blur.compbio.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/dock-fans
>>>
>>>
More information about the Dock-fans
mailing list