[Dock-fans] Fragment screening
Chris Arthur
chris.arthur at bristol.ac.uk
Thu Jun 11 01:54:51 PDT 2009
I'm looking to do some fragment screening, and spent a very entertaining
evening last night with
Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor
discovery
Nature Chemical Biology 5, 358 - 364 (2009)
and
Docking for fragment inhibitors of AmpC β-lactamase
PNAS May 5, 2009 vol. 106 no. 18 7455-7460
Both are excellent articles and well worth a read if you haven't already
done so.
Anyway, my dillema. Both of these articles use Dock 3.5. Can any of the
list members or authors tell me why 3.5 was used rather than 6 and
whether 6 would be up to the job in a similar manner. The closest the
papers get to explaining it is to say something along the lines of 3.5
uses a simple physics scoring algorithm that doesn't penalize fragments
for being, well, fragment like.
Thanks for any input
Chris
More information about the Dock-fans
mailing list